SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (1023)9/19/2007 5:58:31 PM
From: Kirk ©Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2121
 
"Why not turn your thoughts to the future? That's the direction we're heading."

I am sure I am not the only one here who is rather tired of your lame attempts to aid and abet a cover-up.

When callers ask Brinker "what do you think about the market going forward?" his reply is almost always to tell them about his buy in March 2003 and how much the market has gone up since 2003. When you ask him for performance data, he overstates it by as much as 30% for those who took his QQQQ advice for model portfolio #1. It is worse if they put the recommended 5% in TEFQX.

Brinker's best performing P1 since inception under performs the Wilshire5000 considerably if you include the QQQQ advice.

Why don't you call Brinker's show and get HIM to talk about the future and then maybe some of us will have sympathy for your tired, old complaints if he actually does.

Oh yeah, before you add another insult towards my direction. Put me on ignore if you are tired of hearing us talk about the past. As far as I am concerned, Brinker is selling his abilities based on a faulty past record. Talking about the past is 100% relevant.



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (1023)9/20/2007 12:29:22 AM
From: davidk555Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2121
 
ephud weren't you the person who took the position that Bob wasn't discussing his abrupt abandonment of the secular bear market theory on the radio because he had just published it in his newsletter? That was months ago. Right?