Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (68946)	9/20/2007 8:00:16 PM
From: y2kate	Respond to of 213177

And Steve is a liberal dem. What attorneys are left now in the DOJ must have passed muster with the White House...and all that implies...not exactly a friendly room... On the other hand, these attorneys must have kids who love iPhones and iPods, and Apple stock in their 401k ( if they're lucky!) They're probably fans. My guess is, rather than skewer one of the country's most beloved and revered businessmen/innovators, the DOJ will find a way to make this go far, far away.... with everything else that is going wrong with the economy, it would be foolish and pointless to pursue this case any further...

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (68946)	9/20/2007 9:00:33 PM
From: Paul Chiu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 213177

jobs better not be a smartass in the DOJ. here, being the smartest does not help. don't think for a moment that these DOJ paper pushers does not envy what jobs has. jobs should learn to shut up and give only what's required. can he bring counsel? he should. paul