SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (242617)9/21/2007 11:59:49 AM
From: one_less  Respond to of 281500
 
” Name some examples."

As I recall, he commented on the negative reaction to the Pope’s speech about Pope Benedict XVI saying all the protests and violence was uncalled for and inappropriate. I don’t have a link.

I’m not sure how relevant that is to my comment here, nor do I see how it answers my question:

"I don't see what harm there would be in offering him an open discussion on our turf and it might send him back to Iran with a fresh and improved perspective.

What harm do you imagine could come from such a venture?"


================

Whether you or I like, trust, respect, think he has ill intent, or even believe Amadenijad has nothing to do with my comment.

My position on him is recorded on Doug R’s thread.

1) “We have a strategy drawn up for the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization….”

Message 22507815

2) "death to America."

Message 22507834

3) "One day the US too will be History."

Message 22507840

4) " world without America … this slogan and goal can be achieved.”

Message 22507867

I had more but was banned to stop my presentation.

Sometimes banned is beautiful.

Best regards
Gem