SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (2094)9/21/2007 12:12:57 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
I mean raising taxes.

But yeah if we ended the Iraq war and let the tax cuts expire we would certainly have enough money.

Likely not, and its also frequently already accounted for in other ways. Its hardly like new medical care programs are the only thing on the Democrats program.

Even ignoring other categories of spending (despite the fact that Bush doubling federal spending on education is considered to small, and Bush gets attacked for not increasing social spending enough when it has gone up at a rapid clip) you still have the points Makiw raises

A Question for Democrats
Okay, you want to raise taxes on the rich. I get that. But what do you want to do with the money?

At different times, it seems, you want to

1. Fund universal health care.
2. Give a tax cut to the middle class.
3. Reduce the long-term fiscal gap.

Which is it?

To get some idea about the numbers involved here, let's turn to the Congressional Budget Office. The CBO tells us that each percentage-point increase in the top two income tax rates (singles making over about $150K, married taxpayers over about $180K) increases tax revenue by only about $6 billion a year. And even that $6 billion is an overestimate, because it takes into account only a limited range of behavioral responses to higher tax rates.

No one really thinks you can achieve all three of the above goals in any significant degree and pay for them with only tax hikes on the rich. When it comes down to choosing among the three goals, which one would you pick?

gregmankiw.blogspot.com