Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (242711)	9/22/2007 10:16:11 AM
From: SARMAN	Respond to of 281500

What Nadine is afraid of is that he makes clear his position, i.e. regarding the Holocaust myth, which he said the numbers of victims is questionable some people say 6 millions some say 5 and some say 7. Wiping Israel of the map, even some Israelis say in less than 20 years time there will not be an Israel, there will be something like Palereal. What Nadine is afraid of is the clarification of the translation that she twisted to suit her need. Did you know that Israelis call themselves "Yahood" and they call the Palestinians, Arabi. So when an Israeli talks about the Palestinians they say the Arabis did this, the Arabis did that, the Arabis sent a suicide bomber to kill the Yahoods. Now lets translated few words. Arabi = Arab Yahood = Jew. The western press will write with no modification to the translation Arab are killing Jews. It should read Palestinians are killing Israelis. Do you see the difference? Nadine OTH will not bother correcting such statements cause she will lose the sympathy of the west and will not be able to push here ugly agenda. You see why she is afraid that the president of Iran speaks at Colombia.

To: c.hinton who wrote (242711)	9/22/2007 2:00:06 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

give people a podium and they will often make a fool of themselves...the proof is here on SI. Much more likely, they will realize they have a grand opportunity to legitimize their rogue regime, and will use it. They will say soothing and semi-reasonable stuff, and the NYT will report them as reasonable, and the university will hear that they are reasonable, and all the academic and political left will believe it and clutch it to their hearts as yet another reason why war is never the answer and there would be no danger of war except for that crazed warmonger in the White House. And the representative of the rogue regime will smile inwardly at the useful idiots of the West and return home, more sure than ever that there is no danger of interference with his plans for building his weapons. It worked just like that in th 1930s, and it works just like that in the 1990s and 2000s. The people in the 1930s had at least the excuse of novelty. No one had seen such a situation before. What's the excuse today?