SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (22942)9/22/2007 9:11:24 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 217588
 
only mostly fat ladies left, 12 years on up

whether they can sing or not, do not know, and also not sure if they can all sing in english

in any case, the Founding Fathers were betrayed when the FED was set up and America carried its tradition of murder and conquest one shore too far

Tools, structures, foundations? than anyone else? accidentally working for 200 odd years in a looted land and to carry on looting in a wider world of the ancients? Surely not.

The rot is systemic, the beginning was genocide, and the premise is wrong.

Founding Fathers vs Confucius, the competition, not yet on level playing field, is playing out, as we near TeoTwawKi dawn

recommendation: get some worry beads, preferably gold or platinum.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (22942)9/23/2007 12:58:41 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217588
 
Forget the founding fathers. It's not the constitution. It is Carnegie, Mellon, Rockefeller, J.P Morgan and those other heroes that built the US.

The US serves as an example for all other nations: celebrate the Robber Baron! Robber Barons are good!

The history of the US was made by lawlessness. If those guys had sent the law before the pioneers, they had got no where. But the outlaws extended the 13 colonies all the way to California and Oregon.

The Robber Barons after getting rich they built universities to make sure the new generations didn’t have to be robbers to enrich the nations. They were not robbers because they wanted to. It was the only way to build the nations.

Compare that with the Latinos, going with Jesuits to civilize the savages, teach them to behave well. They are all poor today.

The Portuguese had Companhia de Jesus, the Dutch had West Indies Company they want to make money, not teach the savages anything.

Goodness is no good. Lawlessness is good. Then after you get rich you write a nice book to the primary school and everybody is happy. Just like you today.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (22942)9/23/2007 8:24:05 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
Compare ... iht.com "The $5 billion that China is plunking down promises a great leap forward for Congo, and this begins with about 3,200 kilometers of new rail lines and an equivalent amount of new roads. The money will also pay for 31 hospitals and 145 smaller health care centers, along with two large new universities and 5,000 new government housing units ... If war or political upheaval doesn't get in the way, Congo stands to experience more progress in 36 months than it has in 47 years of independence from Belgium, or as a colony of Brussels for that matter."

... and contrast iht.com

"It's no secret that a major reason for the Pentagon's decision to establish its new Africa Command is to contain and keep an eye on China's growing web of development projects across the sub-Saharan regions."

... all from CB Ilaine's regional media rot, as clear as day vs night, good vs evil, right vs wrong, sense vs nonsense.

Pentagon intends to bring war to Africa.

China will save the world, per IHT iht.com , though not in so few words.

"In addition to submarines, Beijing has focused on naval mines, ballistic missiles ( edit: janes.com ) that can hit moving objects at sea and technology that blocks GPS satellites. The goal is "sea denial": dissuading American carrier strike groups from closing in on the Asian mainland wherever and whenever we like. Such dissuasion is the subtle, high-tech end of military asymmetry, as opposed to the crude, low-tech end that we've seen with homemade bombs in Iraq. Whether or not China ever has a motive to challenge America, it will increasingly have the capacity to do so."