Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (351635)	9/23/2007 12:21:16 AM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576876

"You have way too many posts to respond to, so it's no surprise that your "thread attention span" is very short." Ted doesn't have too many posts to respond to....he just responds to too many posts.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (351635)	9/25/2007 12:12:30 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576876

Ted, > Ten, who the hell is talking about corruption? You have way too many posts to respond to, so it's no surprise that your "thread attention span" is very short. Uh.....this is a thread......its called a thread because you back track an exchange of posts all the way to their beginning. I am sorry if that's confusing to you. Anyway, this is the corruption we were talking about: Message 23896192 I don't want to disapppoint you, Ten, but royalty trusts are not corruption. The concept was set up by a group of Republicans a long time ago to protect their assets so they wouldn't have to pay certain taxes. Are you suggesting that its corrupt of Kennedy to take advantage of something created by Republicans?