SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (56100)9/23/2007 1:35:29 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 59480
 
jewishworldreview.com



To: calgal who wrote (56100)9/23/2007 1:46:07 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 59480
 
Is GOP determined to avoid minority voters?

By Carl P. Leubsdorf









jewishworldreview.com | Nothing has more significance for America's long-term political evolution than the demographic changes that are diversifying a mostly white nation.

But you'd never know it from the Republican presidential race.

Not only is the GOP field all white and male — in a year that Democratic contenders include an African-American senator, a Hispanic governor and a woman — but its candidates seem determined to avoid many of the nation's more diverse groups.

So far, most Republicans have bypassed three chances to woo the fastest-growing, most tempting minority, Hispanics. They also turned down a chance to appear before a leading group of gays and lesbians and have avoided some unions, where Republicans poll a significant minority.

And next week, the top GOP hopefuls will pass up a debate designed to spotlight issues of special interest to African-Americans.

Their actions defy warnings that their party needs to expand its share of minority votes or doom itself to minority status. After 2000, President Bush's strategists said he'd lose in 2004 unless he increased his share of the Hispanic vote to 40 percent.

He did — and he won.

Last year, after most leading Republicans denounced his immigration plan providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already here, the party's share of the Hispanic vote dropped sharply.

Just last week, The Wall Street Journal, a pillar of conservatism, contrasted how the parties approached issues of concern to Hispanics in recent debates and warned of more trouble ahead.

"While GOP candidates debated the urgency of erecting a fence from California to Texas along the Mexican border, Democrats debated in Spanish on Univision," it said.

"Tone matters in politics," it added, noting Latino support for the California GOP skidded when Gov. Pete Wilson sought to deny education and health care benefits to the children of illegal aliens.

On Wednesday, The Washington Post quoted some top Republicans criticizing the candidates. "If we're going to be competitive with people of color," said former Housing Secretary Jack Kemp, "we've got to ask them for their vote."

In defense, Republican candidates note that they have had five debates — with many more to come — and need time for fundraising. But so have the Democrats, who have made a far greater effort to appeal to special interest groups.

Two events this month spotlight the GOP problem.

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Arizona Sen. John McCain all declined Tavis Smiley's "All American Presidential Forums on PBS" next Thursday, designed to enable the candidates to address "issues of concern for people of color."

They cited "scheduling conflicts" and the demands of "the accelerated schedule" of primaries.

All eight Democrats joined in a similar forum last June.

Last week, Univision, the leading Spanish-language television network, canceled a GOP debate aimed at Hispanic voters when only Mr. McCain accepted.

A Sept. 9 Democratic debate on Univision drew the full field and more than 2 million viewers.

The canceled GOP debate, which sponsors say they hope to reschedule, was the third time in three months that most Republicans passed up a chance to discuss issues of concern to Hispanics.

In June, only Rep. Duncan Hunter of California accepted an invitation from the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials — along with seven Democrats. No GOP candidates spoke to the annual convention of La Raza.

The pattern goes beyond Hispanic and black groups.

Though about one-third of the nation's teachers are considered to be Republicans, only former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee addressed the National Education Association convention. He was the only one to meet with Urban League officers and to agree to be in the Service Employees International Union's "Walk a Day in My Shoes" program.

To be fair, the leading Republicans also passed up a debate on values issues Monday night.

And on Thursday, Sen. Barack Obama will skip the AARP's forum on health care issues in Iowa.

Democrats forced the cancellation of a planned Congressional Black Caucus debate on the Fox News Channel because they contend that cable network favors the GOP.

A similar event for the Republicans on Nov. 4 in Dallas remains very much in doubt.

Is GOP determined to avoid minority voters?

By Carl P. Leubsdorf









jewishworldreview.com | Nothing has more significance for America's long-term political evolution than the demographic changes that are diversifying a mostly white nation.

But you'd never know it from the Republican presidential race.

Not only is the GOP field all white and male — in a year that Democratic contenders include an African-American senator, a Hispanic governor and a woman — but its candidates seem determined to avoid many of the nation's more diverse groups.

So far, most Republicans have bypassed three chances to woo the fastest-growing, most tempting minority, Hispanics. They also turned down a chance to appear before a leading group of gays and lesbians and have avoided some unions, where Republicans poll a significant minority.

And next week, the top GOP hopefuls will pass up a debate designed to spotlight issues of special interest to African-Americans.

Their actions defy warnings that their party needs to expand its share of minority votes or doom itself to minority status. After 2000, President Bush's strategists said he'd lose in 2004 unless he increased his share of the Hispanic vote to 40 percent.

He did — and he won.

Last year, after most leading Republicans denounced his immigration plan providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already here, the party's share of the Hispanic vote dropped sharply.

Just last week, The Wall Street Journal, a pillar of conservatism, contrasted how the parties approached issues of concern to Hispanics in recent debates and warned of more trouble ahead.

"While GOP candidates debated the urgency of erecting a fence from California to Texas along the Mexican border, Democrats debated in Spanish on Univision," it said.

"Tone matters in politics," it added, noting Latino support for the California GOP skidded when Gov. Pete Wilson sought to deny education and health care benefits to the children of illegal aliens.

On Wednesday, The Washington Post quoted some top Republicans criticizing the candidates. "If we're going to be competitive with people of color," said former Housing Secretary Jack Kemp, "we've got to ask them for their vote."

In defense, Republican candidates note that they have had five debates — with many more to come — and need time for fundraising. But so have the Democrats, who have made a far greater effort to appeal to special interest groups.

Two events this month spotlight the GOP problem.

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Arizona Sen. John McCain all declined Tavis Smiley's "All American Presidential Forums on PBS" next Thursday, designed to enable the candidates to address "issues of concern for people of color."

They cited "scheduling conflicts" and the demands of "the accelerated schedule" of primaries.

All eight Democrats joined in a similar forum last June.

Last week, Univision, the leading Spanish-language television network, canceled a GOP debate aimed at Hispanic voters when only Mr. McCain accepted.

A Sept. 9 Democratic debate on Univision drew the full field and more than 2 million viewers.

The canceled GOP debate, which sponsors say they hope to reschedule, was the third time in three months that most Republicans passed up a chance to discuss issues of concern to Hispanics.

In June, only Rep. Duncan Hunter of California accepted an invitation from the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials — along with seven Democrats. No GOP candidates spoke to the annual convention of La Raza.

The pattern goes beyond Hispanic and black groups.

Though about one-third of the nation's teachers are considered to be Republicans, only former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee addressed the National Education Association convention. He was the only one to meet with Urban League officers and to agree to be in the Service Employees International Union's "Walk a Day in My Shoes" program.

To be fair, the leading Republicans also passed up a debate on values issues Monday night.

And on Thursday, Sen. Barack Obama will skip the AARP's forum on health care issues in Iowa.

Democrats forced the cancellation of a planned Congressional Black Caucus debate on the Fox News Channel because they contend that cable network favors the GOP.

A similar event for the Republicans on Nov. 4 in Dallas remains very much in doubt.

Is GOP determined to avoid minority voters?

By Carl P. Leubsdorf









jewishworldreview.com | Nothing has more significance for America's long-term political evolution than the demographic changes that are diversifying a mostly white nation.

But you'd never know it from the Republican presidential race.

Not only is the GOP field all white and male — in a year that Democratic contenders include an African-American senator, a Hispanic governor and a woman — but its candidates seem determined to avoid many of the nation's more diverse groups.

So far, most Republicans have bypassed three chances to woo the fastest-growing, most tempting minority, Hispanics. They also turned down a chance to appear before a leading group of gays and lesbians and have avoided some unions, where Republicans poll a significant minority.

And next week, the top GOP hopefuls will pass up a debate designed to spotlight issues of special interest to African-Americans.

Their actions defy warnings that their party needs to expand its share of minority votes or doom itself to minority status. After 2000, President Bush's strategists said he'd lose in 2004 unless he increased his share of the Hispanic vote to 40 percent.

He did — and he won.

Last year, after most leading Republicans denounced his immigration plan providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already here, the party's share of the Hispanic vote dropped sharply.

Just last week, The Wall Street Journal, a pillar of conservatism, contrasted how the parties approached issues of concern to Hispanics in recent debates and warned of more trouble ahead.

"While GOP candidates debated the urgency of erecting a fence from California to Texas along the Mexican border, Democrats debated in Spanish on Univision," it said.

"Tone matters in politics," it added, noting Latino support for the California GOP skidded when Gov. Pete Wilson sought to deny education and health care benefits to the children of illegal aliens.

On Wednesday, The Washington Post quoted some top Republicans criticizing the candidates. "If we're going to be competitive with people of color," said former Housing Secretary Jack Kemp, "we've got to ask them for their vote."

In defense, Republican candidates note that they have had five debates — with many more to come — and need time for fundraising. But so have the Democrats, who have made a far greater effort to appeal to special interest groups.

Two events this month spotlight the GOP problem.

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Arizona Sen. John McCain all declined Tavis Smiley's "All American Presidential Forums on PBS" next Thursday, designed to enable the candidates to address "issues of concern for people of color."

They cited "scheduling conflicts" and the demands of "the accelerated schedule" of primaries.

All eight Democrats joined in a similar forum last June.

Last week, Univision, the leading Spanish-language television network, canceled a GOP debate aimed at Hispanic voters when only Mr. McCain accepted.

A Sept. 9 Democratic debate on Univision drew the full field and more than 2 million viewers.

The canceled GOP debate, which sponsors say they hope to reschedule, was the third time in three months that most Republicans passed up a chance to discuss issues of concern to Hispanics.

In June, only Rep. Duncan Hunter of California accepted an invitation from the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials — along with seven Democrats. No GOP candidates spoke to the annual convention of La Raza.

The pattern goes beyond Hispanic and black groups.

Though about one-third of the nation's teachers are considered to be Republicans, only former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee addressed the National Education Association convention. He was the only one to meet with Urban League officers and to agree to be in the Service Employees International Union's "Walk a Day in My Shoes" program.

To be fair, the leading Republicans also passed up a debate on values issues Monday night.

And on Thursday, Sen. Barack Obama will skip the AARP's forum on health care issues in Iowa.

Democrats forced the cancellation of a planned Congressional Black Caucus debate on the Fox News Channel because they contend that cable network favors the GOP.

A similar event for the Republicans on Nov. 4 in Dallas remains very much in doubt.

jewishworldreview.com



To: calgal who wrote (56100)9/27/2007 1:52:11 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 59480
 
Hillary Clinton 'could cost Democrats dear'

By Toby Harnden in Washington
Last Updated: 2:29am BST 27/09/2007

A leaked Democratic poll has suggested that Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner in the race for the party's presidential nomination, could lose the 2008 election because of her "very polarised image".

The survey by the Democratic pollsters Lake Research indicated that both Mrs Clinton and Barack Obama, second in the Democratic race, trailed Rudy Giuliani, the Republican front runner, in 31 swing congressional districts.

The private memo, leaked to The Washington Post, painted what researchers described as a "sobering picture" for Democrats who believe that President George W Bush's disastrous favourability numbers almost guarantee they will capture the White House next year.

All party preference polls show that Democrats are much more popular than Republicans. But when the names of individual candidates are used, the gap narrows considerably.

"The images of the two early [Democratic] favourites are part of the problem," the memo said.

The leaked poll found that Mr Giuliani, a centrist Republican with liberal stances on issues such as abortion and gay rights, leads Mrs Clinton by 49 per cent to 39 per cent in the swing districts.

The former New York mayor enjoyed a much slimmer lead of just one per cent over Mr Obama in the poll, conducted in August. It has long been known that Mrs Clinton has "high negatives" among voters but the assessment of Mr Obama that his "image is soft, and one-fifth of voters do not gave a firm impression of him" was a surprise.

The poll found that Mrs Clinton, in particular, could damage the chances of congressional Democratic candidates on the ballot. The sensitivity of the issue was underlined by the reluctance of Democrats to discuss the survey.

"We're not commenting on this poll," said Daniel Gotoff, co-author of the memo accompanying the Lake Research poll. "It was leaked and obviously not by us."

But Andy Arnold, a Democratic county chairman in Greenville, South Carolina - a key primary state - said: "I'd be a little bit dishonest if I didn't admit that in some parts of the country, and probably my own, having Hillary Clinton at the top of the ticket will have some impact further down.

"People have that concern and are voicing it. The thing with Hillary is that most people have their minds made up. There's a fundamentalist crowd who have an inordinate obsession with things sexual and what happened [during Bill Clinton's administration] played into that."

He added, however, that "whoever we nominate, the right-wing attack machine will make them into the devil by November 2008".

Frank Luntz, a leading Republican pollster, said: "This poll reveals what grassroots Democrats have been concerned about. Hillary is their choice ideologically but not necessarily politically and they're afraid she could lose.

"Democrats want to win more than anything else and they will compromise on policy to achieve electability." Mrs Clinton, he said, prompted a series of perceptions that could damage her.

"She never admits she's wrong. There's a lack of candour and a harshness to her. She doesn't have any of the typical challenges of a female candidate but that is in itself a challenge.

"She doesn't show heart. People see her as strong and a fighter, someone who is qualified and can get things done but she's missing that personal element, that emotional connection.

"Rudy does better among independents than Hillary does and in the end the candidate that gets the majority of independents wins the election."
telegraph.co.uk