Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (351905)	9/25/2007 8:53:19 AM
From: RetiredNow	Respond to of 1578699

Biofuels are a dead-end in my opinion. It takes more fossil fuels to create a gallon of biofuel, than it saves from making and burning gasoline. So it does nothing for us. About the only thing it does, is help us get oil independent, which is a good thing. The logical conclusion of anyone studying this field is either to go electric or to use hydrogen. Hydrogen is still to expensive a technology, but the electrical infrastructure already exists and the technology up and down the supply and demand chain already exists as well. Nuclear, solar, wind, etc at the source, and all-electric cars and houses at the point of use will get us off the oil, solve our energy problems, be a huge net-benefit economically, and reduce greenhouse gases. It's a no-brainer.