Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (221358)	9/26/2007 12:56:55 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 793917

Notice how things really went down hit after 1920 ?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (221358)	10/9/2007 10:15:16 AM
From: Sunny	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793917

I would like to thank Rambi and JDN for their thoughtful comments as well. Gold, thank you for the succinct listing of changes to the status of the granting of voting rights to the citizenry. I apologize for not responding to you in a timely manner. Nevertheless, we are now seeing the results of granting voting rights to people who are now exercising those rights to vote for people who will give them things. The People who have a vested interest in the country by virtue of ownership are by an large pay the greatest % of the taxes that support both the local, state and federal governments. As for the disenfranchisement of the non property owners, if they are takers, I care about them on a personal level but I do not wish to turn over the management of the government to people who would pander to them. Look at where the money gets spent and which politicians are essentially buying there votes by the programs they sponsor and vote for. The Property ownership is not bigoted, sexist or any other ist. It simply says you care of enough about where you live to be best suited to responsibly choose who runs the government in your area.