Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (22915)	9/27/2007 5:21:05 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Apparently the latest issue of Nature has an article in which it s revealed that the atmospheric chemistry model that GW adherents have been using to predict disaster has a critical flaw. Reportedly the chemical reaction that the NASA model used to predict the bulk of the Ozone destruction is overstated by over 10 times. This leaves over 60% of the ozone destruction in the stratosphere unexplained. GW fanatics were quick to state that the absence of facts would not change their beliefs.