Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Le coin des prospecteurs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jpthoma1 who wrote (14252)	9/27/2007 3:45:11 PM
From: Bruce Robbins	Respond to of 40427

Merci JP! Needs more drilling IMVHO. Goes to show you that the market is hungry for another big story. B

To: jpthoma1 who wrote (14252)	9/27/2007 3:50:52 PM
From: Wayne Campbell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40427

JP Lac Rocher may be a good comparison, with the high grade Ni. However the PGEs were much lower I think, and high grade was only locally at the contact with the host gneisses, and just didn't go anywhere to make enough high grade tonnage. Some VMS deposits in the general area too. Host was not peridotite, I think gabbro, pyroxenite and even in the gneisses. Voisy has lots of cobalt This may be a hybrid of some sort...the grade is similar to some of the embayment Sudbury stuff (high PGE, Au, Ag), but setting is too difficult to say other than it is near some VMS deposits and there seems to be only peridotite rather than a multi-phase intrusion. I'm sure at least one nickel expert is looking at samples right now. WC