Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SARMAN who wrote (243308)	9/27/2007 4:53:47 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

I'm not embarrassed. Post the link to support your libelous statement. You know it is not true and so does everyone else watching the thread. If you can't, be sure I won't spare you embarrassment. J.

To: SARMAN who wrote (243308)	9/27/2007 4:59:24 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Well, Sourman? I'm waiting. Message 23919753

To: SARMAN who wrote (243308)	9/27/2007 5:04:06 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Well, Sourman? I'm STILL waiting. Message 23919753

To: SARMAN who wrote (243308)	9/27/2007 5:10:07 PM
From: DizzyG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You've gone out on quite a limb Sourman...where is the evidence to back up your allegations? Diz-

To: SARMAN who wrote (243308)	9/27/2007 5:10:35 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Sourman: I am leaving for a meeting but I will expect to see your proof when I get back ......... If you were misled by Search4boyz or one of the other perverts, a simple and humble apology will do. You can even PM it so you save face with your buds.... J.

To: SARMAN who wrote (243308)	9/27/2007 5:21:16 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Jlallen and SARMAN. If you must continue this, please provide the substantiation for your claims. If not then we have to conclude these personal allegations are false. False allegations are usually indicative of anger and vindictive attempts to avenge some unrelated offense. Making such allegations are much more likely to create new problems than resolve past disputes and often increase the complexities of injustice all the way around, especially when loyal lurkers begin to weigh in with their two cents. So, I will try to limit my commentary to a penny's worth. In the spirit of reasoned discourse, justice and resolution of issues, it would be nice if you could deal more directly with whatever the unrelated complaints are. I feel bound to point out that your expressions of hostility toward one another are at the expense of topical discourse on this thread and have nothing to do with foreign affairs. and ... It's getting kind of icky. Best regards, gem

To: SARMAN who wrote (243308)	9/30/2007 1:31:31 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 281500

Let me see if i can clarify matters for you: What you said is legally slanderous. You are liable for it. If you are in the US (and you'd better hope you're not or leave if you are), he can sue you for everything you've got and everything you will ever get. Now JLA is a lawyer; it would cost him essentially nothing to sue you. And JLA is a lawyer; it would cost him essentially nothing to sue; it would cost you tens of thousands of dollars to defend. You're only hope is to find that link. NOW FIND IT! Otherwise you are a liar and Allah will burn your worthless *** in Hell!