SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fastpathguru who wrote (241479)9/29/2007 3:33:03 PM
From: FJBRespond to of 275872
 
You should become an attorney fpg. You might make more money...



To: fastpathguru who wrote (241479)9/29/2007 3:59:28 PM
From: RitzRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
In U.S. antitrust law, the Sherman Act addresses single-firm conduct by providing a remedy against "[e]very person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize . . . any part of the trade or commerce among the several States."[3] This prohibition does not condemn monopoly per se but only monopoly that has been acquired or maintained through prohibited conduct: Most businessmen don't like their competitors, or for that matter competition. They want to make as much money as possible and getting a monopoly is one way of making a lot of money. That is fine, however, so long as they do not use methods calculated to make consumers worse off in the long run.[4]

Taken from:

en.wikipedia.org

Without a finding of Anti-competitive practices, there can be no violation of US anti-trust law. A monopoly that arises or maintains itself without such behaviour, for example through superior production costs or superior design, is perfectly legal under US law. For a list of such practices you can look here:

en.wikipedia.org

I take it that since the discussion on this board has shifted to a discussion on anti-trust law and lawsuits, that the general sentiment is that the AMD has undergone what I would SCOization, going from a company purporting to compete in the marketplace to one who's focus is to obtain legal remedies via lawsuits. I believe that this is the correct assessment. AMD's business model is permanently broken, and it's only realistic hopes for long term survival revolve around acquisition and the legal system.