Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Madharry who wrote (109324)	10/1/2007 10:33:54 AM
From: Freedom Fighter	Respond to of 132070

Madharry, >I dont think you are correct about this for the following reason- the best security situation that israel was in was when iraq and iran were at war with each other. We can clearly see now that saddam is gone that Iran is now a much bigger threat than Saddam ever was. Therefore if Pearle was advocating this on behalf of Israel it was pretty foolish.< Pearle advocating the overthrow of Saddam to senior people in Israel's is well documented long before 9/11. Advocating the same in the U.S. as part of the influential Defense Policy Board is also well documented. The fact that he was an idiot about how the war would actually go and what impact it would have on both Israel and the U.S. says nothing about whether he and the other neocons lead the charge and where their loyalties were.