SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (243618)10/1/2007 9:54:25 AM
From: SARMAN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Elroy, you need an extended vacation.
Reads to me like you are blaming the US for the introduction of European Jews into Palestine.
Wasn't meant that way.
Under Saddam, Iraqis were killing other Iraqis in order to rule over them for ~30 years. You don't think 80% (Kurds + Shias) of Iraqis voluntarily lived under Saddam's leadership, do you? And the current crop of "insurgents" aren't killing Iraqis because of the US, they are killing innocent Iraqis because they want themselves to rule over other Iraqis, and not have Iraq's elected government rule. The result is the unpleasant carnage we read about in the papers, which is brought on by Iraqis, not coalition troops.
Come on Elroy, you know that removing Saddam was a recipe for disaster. And yest the Americans are to blame for the instability in Iraq.

Or do you consider blowing up a line of 50 random Iraqi police recruits a reasonable way to fight US occupation? Does "Kill potential Iraqi police in order to resist foreign influence" make any sense to you? It doesn't to most of the world.
Under the US formed Iraqi government, those Iraqis were seen as traitors. I repeat my question to you Elroy, if America was invaded what would do, sprinkle rice and flower on your invaders? And let anyone cooperating with the invaders go free with not retribution. Right?
Right, so all good things in Arabia are due to Arabs, and all bad things due to the outside boogeyman? If Dubai had been left without "foreign influence/protection", all of the UAE would have been swallowed up by Saudi Arabia and it would not exist. You gonna thank the foreigners for that, or would you prefer to have let the locals take care of themselves 30 years ago, which would have translated as the UAE locals ceasing to exist?
You being thick. It was the locals that demanded the progress and it was not shoved down their throats. And no one is denying the foreign influence in Dubai, the influence was requested and was not imposed. Which part you do not understand.