SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (91056)10/1/2007 11:14:07 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
thanks. So the first thing I notice here is the SEC charged them with CIVIL, and not CRIMINAL behavior, which is wierd because I thought you only got prison terms with criminal charges. Well obviously Forbes was criminally charged recently because he got 12 years.

That fraud statement below has me questioning it a little- I think its cookie jar accounting again, which is being called fraud now and imho it was NOT. Analysts were supposed to look at cash flow and debt. If you acquire a company you pretty much have to move revenue around from reserves.

This guy might have been a crook but I don't think the CEOs are getting fair trials anymore. If this was so clear why were there 2 prior mistrials?

He was convicted last year of one count of conspiracy and two counts of false reporting after two previous mistrials for his role in the accounting irregularities.

The president of CUC, Kirk Shelton, was convicted in January 2005 of 12 counts of fraud and related charges, and sentenced to 10 years in prison; the CEO and Chairman, Walter Forbes, deadlocked the juries in two accounting fraud trials, and a third trial is planned for September 2006. The Securities and Exchange Commission brought civil charges against Forbes and Shelton for the "long-running financial fraud", which, it alleged, started in 1985. The SEC stated that CUC inflated its books in order to inflate its stock price, which allowed it to use its stock to buy other companies; and in turn these mergers and acquisitions were executed in order to generate financial reserves and purchase reserves that were intended to be "big enough to bury the fraud".