Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zincman who wrote (93893)	10/2/2007 8:53:32 AM
From: TheBusDriver	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312315

interesting but not good enough I think....anybody else?

To: Zincman who wrote (93893)	10/2/2007 10:13:39 AM
From: ralfph	Respond to of 312315

TK- yah got mineralization from surface. 200 ft of 83 grams per ton. they are on hole #10 (beats the heck out of the other drillers ) They intersected 4 meters of mineralization in the limestone 62 grams silver and a 1 % zinc kick , so we can conclude that the limestone is not barren. What they have is mine grade. What we do not know is how big . Colquipucro is not a bust, it is not a mine either. But what do you expect on a few holes ? LRG runs to 2 bucks and all they have is 2 flakes of gold in a pan and never drills a hole . TK drills their claim , comes up with mineralization and does not move at all. Go figure. ralfph