SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (353219)10/2/2007 1:43:11 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1577866
 
re: Ethanol is certainly better from CO2 perspective than burning fossil fuels, but the high labor (and other) costs make it a long term loser.

Pure electric vehicles certainly seem like the ultimate solution, but in the meantime the infrastructure is in place for ethanol and it can make an incremental difference, especially as we evolve from hybrid to plug-in hybrid to pure electric. The 80/20 ethanol stuff in a plug-in hybrid is not all that far away and a huge reduction in fossil fuel per mile. In the meantime the electric infrastructure can simultaneously catch up to the increased demand.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (353219)10/3/2007 2:32:43 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1577866
 
I agree with that, but I don't think we should shoot ourselves in the foot by granting excessive subsidies on short term ineffective measures at expense of long term effective measures (solar, nuclear)

I agree.