SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (16050)10/2/2007 12:48:59 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224744
 
all sewerRATs are drowned in 2008



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (16050)10/2/2007 2:01:11 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Respond to of 224744
 
It appeared inevitable NY Mets would win the pennant. Obama could upset Hillary's media matters cart.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (16050)10/3/2007 5:12:34 AM
From: tonto  Respond to of 224744
 
You stated that you could not support anyone who voted for the war in Iraq. Now you support two...

Edwards Supports War on Iran

Hat-tip to Lindsay: speaking to the Herzliya Conference yesterday, Edwards backed aggressive action against Iran. While he did not condone war explicitly, he used the exact same phrase Bush used when asked about the possibility of a nuclear strike against Iran: “All the options are on the table.”

[Link] All the options are on the table to ensure that Iran will never get a nuclear weapon,” said Edwards, who is running for president for the second time. He also ran in the 2004 election both as a presidential and then as a vice presidential candidate.

In speaking via satellite to the conference from the US, he said Iran’s nuclear ambition represents the single greatest security threat not only to Israel but to the United States as well.

He added that his country had abdicated its responsibility and had not done enough to stop Iran.

Although my description of people who commit a crime, apologize, and then commit another crime was meant to apply to Clinton, Edwards fits the bill perfectly. He voted for the war on Iraq. Then he turned against the war, just as its approval rate sank below the bottom of the Mariana Trench. And now he’s already backing an even more destructive...