Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (243759)	10/2/2007 5:10:11 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>Unlike you, I'm not going to fall for supporting the Muslim Brotherhood just because they form a front group that has the word "Freedom" in it. " Ehhh? you are making that up, I've declared no such loyalty. I posted text with a comment You absolutely fell for it. You posted MAS texts as if they were a trustly source of known liberals, with no connection to terrorists, when they come out of the very same group that produced Al Qaeda's number two, Ayman al Zawahiri! This is liking posting pleas for racial harmony from David Duke, and telling everybody to take him seriously! My reaction to MAS' noble declarations against terrorism is that I wish I could believe them, but I don't. It's taqquiya. The way it works (the Saudis do this too) is that they loudly denounce "terrorism" and "taking of innocent life" in the abstract, but when you get to the fine print, "terrorism" only involves Al Qaeda blowing up fellow Muslims inside Saudi Arabia, or cases like that. When it comes to Hamas blowing up Israelis in Jerusalem, that is not "terrorism", it is "armed resistance" and is entirely legitimate. So I've learned to look for the fine print. You will note that the entire article didn't name even one specific attack to condemn, not even 9/11.