SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (2179)10/2/2007 6:32:45 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
If the whole purpose is to create a ranking of which countries people live the longest on the average, than you don't want to make any such adjustments.

But if your point is to try to use the life expectancies as a measurement of the quality of the health care and health care insurance systems in a country, than you would probably have to make those adjustments and others as well.

Actually since differences in life expectancy are largely determined by things besides differences in the basic setup of the health care insurance systems, it probably doesn't make a lot of sense to use it as an important measure of the quality of the system even with a lot of adjustments, but if you are going to use it, the adjustments make sense in this context.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (2179)10/2/2007 8:01:25 PM
From: Robohogs  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 
So, let's take an extreme example. If 100% of Americans died tomorrow in car accidents and shooting escapades, the life expectancy would clearly drop to a very low number (somewhere in 30s?) and it would have nothing to do with the healthcare system other than trauma care.

Jon