Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (16628)	10/3/2007 7:29:48 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

You're admitting orbital dynamics can overcome CO2? Tsk tsk. Oh my God, it gets much worse: You will note on that graph that we should be starting the downhill slide to colder temps, and lower CO2 levels. Note how brief the prior peaks were, they are quite sharp. Instead, we have turned on another source of warming, and this is sufficiently great to place us on an upward trend rather than downward, with increasing CO2 levels rather than falling ones as we would expect from the historical pattern shown in the graph. Are you claiming human CO2 increases are putting off the next ice age? In effect, this is an argument AGW is good. My opinion has long been that to the extent we might affect the weather (and that isn't that clear that we have, despite the propaganda to the contrary) the effect, if any, is more likely to be benign than negative.