SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Honey_Bee who wrote (1326)10/3/2007 7:34:26 PM
From: octavianRespond to of 2121
 
Honey said:

<<He said that the Brinker's canceled his subscription and told him it was because of something they claimed he posted on the internet.>>

--Honey, did this sweet and wonderful poster, who would NEVER do anything wrong, even bother to tell the Brinker's that he did NOT post newsletter info on the net?

If not, why not?

If so, what did the Brinkers say?

Is this sweet and wonderful poster a basher, or a non-basher?

Before you answer that question, may I have one guess?




To: Honey_Bee who wrote (1326)10/3/2007 7:46:10 PM
From: queenleahRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 2121
 
Excuse me, Ms Queen, but why do you claim it is conjecture? Are you calling this well-respected poster a liar?

I've said no such thing.

He said that the Brinker's canceled his subscription and told him it was because of something they claimed he posted on the internet.

Where? When?

He also said that they refunded the remaining three months of his subscription and told him he could not subscribe again.

Can you direct us to proof of same?

I don't know what happened but I do know that there are always at least two sides to every story. And I'm betting that if it happened, there were reasons for it.

If he got the service out of his subscription and got his money back for what he didn't get, yes, it would be disappointing but perhaps not the outrage that it's being made out to be.