SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: octavian who wrote (1375)10/5/2007 8:12:37 PM
From: queenleahRespond to of 2121
 
I'm not even sure why we are having this conversation.

Me either, but actually it's because there was some hollering about it from the ba...um...from the esteemed opposition.

Does anyone here think Brinker was WRONG to discontinue James' subscription if, in fact, James WAS posting information from the newsletter?

Not me...but well, maybe a few.

Has James ever denied the accusation?

Not that we know of. Odd, isn't it?

If James ever denies the accusation, THEN we will have something to talk about.

Maybe, but I don't suppose we'll ever know for sure.

Hey dija, did you see the news about the recording company suing the woman for infringement of copyright for "sharing" their copyrighted work product? Do you think that's discussable relative to Brinker?



To: octavian who wrote (1375)10/5/2007 9:00:44 PM
From: yaetmoRespond to of 2121
 
Octavian,

Hulbert would have no need for such agreements. As an editorializer, he's free to use parts of Brinker's copyrighted material, as long as he maintains his writings from an editorial basis.

As I understand it, as long as he substantially editorializes or critiques each page of Brinker's Newsletter, he could probably quote 100% of a newsletter.