Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug R who wrote (16638)	10/6/2007 2:26:33 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

Doug > let's just say that if a certain party...say Dr. David Kelly was the beginning of a trail which runs into...say Lord Hutton...and then the trail runs into 10 Downing St in the person of Tony Blair... But today Tony Blair has gone. He was important only at that time. That's why he was invited to Bilderberg. Next year we'll find Gordon Brown there. Anyway, I find it strange that you should mention David Kelly. Perhaps it's because you knew I was involved in trying to get his inquest reopened. > Tony Blair was questioned in the House of Commons yesterday on his involvement with the secretive Bilderberg Group. Liberal Democrat MP, Norman Baker asked Blair to provide a full answer to a previous 12th October question about Bilderberg and whether Mr Blair had had any involvement in Bilderberg Conferences since he became Prime Minister in 1997. For what it's worth and I'm sure you are not aware of it, I gave Norman Baker certain medical information about David Kelly's "suicide". In fact, my name even appears at the bilderberg.org website although I know nothing particular about Bilderberg itself. google.com > And the group at the end of the trail is the same at the end many of these trails........ That's only because one can't go further. Everyone knows about Bilderberg like they know about Freemasons but because of the secrecy associated with both organizations people feel they must be up to no good. Although I'm not one myself, I know some Freemasons and I think they are very decent people who would never aspire to criminal acts. > How would one behave if confronted by representatives from such a group? You seem to think they are thugs like the Mafia. I think Bilderberg is an elite, largely social, club to which various important people are invited to meet others and give talks etc. I have no doubt that many of its members are extremely influential and I am also sure that if Bilderberg didn't exist another similar and also very exclusive club would. Today, we do know the members of Bilderberg and also those people who attend every meeting but I have never heard or read that wars or invasions or any other criminal act like that are plotted at these meetings. > JFK notes one characteristic of their methods is intimidation. Knowing what they're about, if one were told by them to seriously avoid pointing at them, it would probably be very wise to do so unless one was very seriously protected from them. Obviously JFK had some serious enemies and I'm sure he knew what he was talking about. But that was nearly 50 years ago and much more is known about Bilderberg now. That's why I believe the REAL decisions are made elsewhere, in secret and not by a whole crowd.