SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: InvesTing who wrote (1422)10/7/2007 12:53:39 PM
From: lizardKRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 2121
 
WOW!! Looks like the "timeout" has ended for the few morons who are now reposting here after a few month banishment. Too bad..They add nothing of value to this board..
I am not refering to you - "InvestTing (i.e. stockalot) your posts, though voluminous, contain cogent thought.
ElanQuatro, Queenwhatever, Octavian etc..these are complete idiots.



To: InvesTing who wrote (1422)10/7/2007 2:31:59 PM
From: queenleahRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 2121
 
'Afternoon, stockie! Full frontal attack with all available troops?

You have only to look at his post to see that you cast doubt on the veracity of this obviously true account of the PETTY Bob Brinker move.

"look at his post"? Whose post? Whoever you're talking about, there's plenty of room for doubt, but I'm not casting anything. I'm just asking questions, in order to better discern the current altitude on the mountains-out-of-molehills gauge (useful tool if you don't have it in your repertoire). Just isn't good practice to blindly accept one side of a story from a stranger and make a BIG deal out of it without asking further questions. You might want to try it some time.

And then you show your true goal of shilling:

Keep in mind as documented you whined and peed and moaned that maybe Bob Brinker really didn't do this dastardly deed. [emphasis added]


Tsk, tsk, stockie, such language!

WHERE, WHEN did I say that?

NO, I DID NOT say Brinker didn't do it.

You have to wonder about the strength of someone's case when they feel they have to resort to misquoting and get all agitated about simple questions.



To: InvesTing who wrote (1422)10/7/2007 3:01:11 PM
From: queenleahRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 2121
 
And BTW, stockie:

Queen said, not unpredictably because of a rather obvious connection...

In this case, your opinion of what's "rather obvious", not unpredictably, is rather entirely WRONG. There is absolutely, unequivocally, NO connection between any Brinker and myself, as I've said before...which once again demonstrates that what may seem "obvious" to some may be entirely wrong.