Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (1453)	10/8/2007 11:06:32 AM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2121

Kirk said: Anyone who talks about copyright nonsense is blowing smoke to hide the fact Brinker will take revenge if you LEGALLY and Publicly disagree with his nonsense. "Revenge" being legally canceling the subscription? LOL and Big Deal, but that's when the hollering started, isn't it? Seems to me that the Brinker opposition takes it all far harder (and makes a lot more of it) than James himself.

To: Kirk © who wrote (1453)	10/8/2007 7:36:21 PM
From: octavian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2121

kirk said: <<He also boldly stated on the radio that we were in a secular bear market that would not end until we broke the old highs by 5%.... Then when we got close, he raised the bar to 10%... then AFTER I pointed out we already reached 10% if you include dividends...>> --I guess I'm really dumb. I thought we had to compare apples to apples. Wasn't the 2000 high in the S&P around 1550? And isn't the 2007 high about 1555? If you add the dividends to the 1555, don't you also have to add them to the 1550? What am I missing?