Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (244317)	10/8/2007 3:02:49 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"The topic I posted on was not referenced to what Nancy Polosi said and therefor your introduction of her quote in response to my post would have suggested, to most people, that YOU felt her message was somehow responsive to what I posted." Yes a direct response. I responded to comments from you suggesting that anyone who hopes for the best or who sees the military as having accomplished objectives in Iraq is a blind follower or a cheer leader. That narrow minded prelude to everything that could otherwise be an open and constructive discussion is offensive to free thinkers such as myself. So I posted the view of Nancy Pelosi, the most ardent anti-Military in Iraq spokesperson I can think of. That view should have given you pause for consideration. She is an open minded person whom I admire greatly but who doesn't represent my views on all things. Get it? no probably not... Best regards, gem