Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (354160)	10/8/2007 9:11:31 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1587923

"Do you think unused body parts from victims of genocide should be thrown away or given to researchers?" Love the little straw guys, don't you Tench? Just line them up and whack them down. Great fun. There are many differences between what Chris posted and what you changed it to. For one, those little embryos are the legal property of the parents. So unless laws are passed, they get frozen until they either get implanted into the recipient of their choice or are disposed of. Now a lot of people don't like the idea of strangers carrying their children to term. So disposal is the only option. Why it is better to flush them than to do research on them is very hard for me to see. The above does not shed any light on the issue at all. Trying to draw a correlation between fertility treatments and genocide is a torturous exercise at best. There is no genocide using any available definition. Besides, I don't have any unused body parts. Do you?