SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: etchmeister who wrote (36173)10/9/2007 12:50:44 AM
From: Kirk ©  Respond to of 95656
 
Wonder what the "earnings growth distribution" is of all NASDAQ listed companies;
it's probably confined to a number of companies like AAPL and RIMM et al - coincidentally AAPL benefits greatly from chips and probably also RIMM.


I think you hit it on the head.

Companies are benefiting from Momopolistic consolidations so HP, AAPL, Cisco, AT&T are doing well by buying out their competition and getting better prices from their suppliers.

For example, I own a company that had about a third of its business from Cingular which was just about to upgrade its networks. SW Bell bought T for the name and Cingular for the network and then sh*t-canned the network improvements... and locked up AAPL customers on a crappy, slow network... so my company fell like a brick as T is not spending to upgrade its network.. Much easier to act like a monopoly... than actually compete.

Fortunately, by diversification, I own some HP that is doing the same thing .... buying its competition and cutting profit margin at suppliers....

Or FNSR, an optical component supplier to Cisco. I heard Cisco is making about $1B a year marking up the Finisar components to a 90% profit margin... but FNSR can't sell them direct because Cisco has a monopoly on the code needed... or something like that... You get the idea even if I am not being really clear. Finisar isn't reaping the rewards for its investment... Cisco is!