Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (152325)	10/8/2007 11:37:56 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 225578

Now that is interesting. I would assume multi family dwellings would be taxed at a different rate than single family homes. And taking another look I see that most of the value is in the land. Not surprising for that area. And I am really surprised at the total assessed value. I always thought that homes in the LA area were worth more. We recently got a new assessment for our place, and the land value doubled while the blding only rose my a few thousand dollars. That kind of assessment is new in this area. The bldings have always been valued higher than the land. Tax Information Tax Assessment History 2004 2005 2006 Total property tax paid: $3,128 $3,228 $3,296 Assessed value bldgs: $14,279 $14,855 $15,152 Assessed value land: + $260,014 + $270,518 + $275,928 Total assessed value: = $274,293 = $285,373 = $291,080