Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (23707)	10/9/2007 11:29:36 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217825

< denial? where? show us.>http://siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=23457855 You could of course just mean you were haggling over the second significant figure, or maybe at a stretch the first. But now you raise the big surplus of males as an issue whereas previously it was not at all an issue and wasn't even true [implicit in your comments]. I'm sure you were seeking only truth and enlightenment. Anyway, so now you agree that nature did somehow arrange for LOTS more males to be born than normal ratios in humans and it's just coincidence that draconian laws against selectively aborting female foetuses exist. Have it both ways if you like. It's always fun to walk on both sides of the street simultaneously. Mqurice