Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (354307)	10/12/2007 2:14:43 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576775

Don't know why she's dead - but what the cops did was all done in plain view - they followed their training - so yeah I defend their actions. Now if something was done in the cell, that's another matter entirely. Also, leaving her alone is standard procedure - it was supposedly only for a few minutes. They said they heard her continuing her rants and they checked on her, then after a bit she went silent and when they checked again she was slumped over. What went on in the cell was not in plain view. After telling her husband they had her in custody, it took them 2 hours after they noted her death to tell him she was dead. Why? As for the amount of time in the cell, as I understand it, we only have the word of the cops........anecdotal evidence at best. ....maybe the husband was watching the kids while she went into rehab. Not everyone goes to rehab accompanied. For someone so interested in what happened you sure put a lot of maybes and perhaps in the picture. Do you have any actual follow up information? No, and neither do you. And that's my point.......you've assumed right from the get go that the cops did nothing wrong. And yet, you do not have all the facts to support your position.