SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Vosilla who wrote (87540)10/10/2007 3:51:49 PM
From: Real Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
It's the basic carry trade - the dollar moved down slowly only
because BB raised rates faster than the Europeans. Pound is high
because their rates are high. All commodity based currencies
are high because of high oil. OZ have very high rates too,
but Canada doesn't.

So now as Ben moves to cut, the same force (400 trillion
notional) that supported
the trade deficit all these years is moving against the dollar.
As rates in other countries rise beyond US rates, this bunch
will start betting on the fall of US bond market, but not yet.
As rates go down, they will bet on the rise of the long bond,
which has nothing to do with worsening economic conditions
or an impending recession.

Vigilantes are dead. Carry traders, on the other hand, rule the
currency market. Why, and does this make any sence? The answer
to the second question is it doesn't, cause the carry trade
largely ignores the printing, unless its outrageous. The
answer to the first question is 400 Trillion notional.
Unless the derivative bomb explodes, carry trade will
continue to rule the forex.

The unknown is the behavior of USD "investors", the CBs.
Once they dump dollars, the carry trade is likely to implode.
But.... that's precicely the reason they don't do it!



To: John Vosilla who wrote (87540)10/10/2007 3:59:30 PM
From: CalculatedRisk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
S&P 500 Q3 earnings likely to turn negative - Thomson Financial
marketwatch.com

Should year-on-year comparisons turn negative, it would be the first quarter of negative growth since the first quarter of 2002, Butters said.