Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (23940)	10/11/2007 9:19:30 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 217837

Not true TJ. All along, you have claimed that gold would beat QCOM. Even when QCOM was at $12 split adjusted, you were saying "repent, sell buy gold". You were wrong. QCOM since then went to $53 a share. That's 4x. In the same time, gold went from US$330 [more or less] to $600 or so. You were wrong. With the royalty rumbles, QCOM has taken a dive as panic set in that judges, juries, politicians and thieving competitors would confiscate QCOM's property. In the years since Y2K, the USA has grown hugely more than China. A 5% increase in the huge USA economy is a huge absolute increase. For China to achieve such an increase, they need plenty of 10% growth rate. In the 1980s, as Japan soared, the USA was considered by many to be a has-been. There was a glitch and a change in 1990 and Japan went by the wayside. China is now soaring and with a huge population base to push it along. Maybe that will continue. Mqurice