SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: InvesTing who wrote (1547)10/12/2007 4:02:29 PM
From: joefromspringfieldRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 2121
 
InvesTing

"I guess if what James said were true, then it would be all the more reason for Brinker to cancel his subscription wouldn't it?"

Maybe James should just renew online at Bob Brinker.com. If Brinker is getting senile he probably won't remember canceling James's subscription.



To: InvesTing who wrote (1547)10/12/2007 4:20:55 PM
From: queenleahRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 2121
 
stockie, seemingly determined to revive a dead horse and spinning again but perhaps spinning out of control about dija's guessing on the Brinker/James cancellation topic, said:

Octavian said trying to disagree but actually agreeing with my take...

stockie, dija (octavian) said that he was guessing. Point is, guess what you may, it's still guessing. Maybe correct, maybe not. Everyone's entitled.

As far as that goes, the fact that dija didn't find what he was looking for in a (I'm guessing) brief search, doesn't demonstrate that it isn't (or wasn't) out there somewhere. Once again, I'm not saying it was or wasn't, just pointing out reality sans spin.

AAR, as far as I'm concerned, IF it WAS because of James' Brinkerbashing comments on the net, the cancellation was well deserved. James got his money's worth. JMO.

What were Brinker's true motives?

What were James' true motives?

I'll wager we'll never know, guess as we may.

*



To: InvesTing who wrote (1547)10/13/2007 12:24:34 AM
From: octavianRespond to of 2121
 
InvesTing said:

<<I guess if what James said were true, then it would be all the more reason for Brinker to cancel his subscription wouldn't it? :) >>

--Actually, I think bob cancelled James' subscription because what James said WASN'T true.

James was dreaming things up in a desperate effort to make brinker look as bas as possible and curry favor with kirk and the other bashers.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News