Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (223947)	10/13/2007 4:50:13 PM
From: MJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793586

"As for Carville and Matalin, I don't trust either one of them. To me it seems like an unholy alliance." I think it is an alliance but one of power and control-----Clintons, Carville and Matlin, GW Sr. and then Matlin moves onto advising GW Jr. Given Carville and Matlin's arrangement there is nothing they can safely talk about that isn't political and might not compromise elections. Maybe we do need a third party and or revolutions within these two parties. mj@skepticalandcynical

To: ManyMoose who wrote (223947)	10/13/2007 9:24:21 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793586

Here is how I see it: Say you take a Jew, a Christian and a Muslim and have them try to agree on who's God is the right God. Well, we all know nothing will come of that-lol! Now, say you take Will Rogers, Mark Twain and Abrahm Lincoln and have them try to convince each other their particular idea is correct. Those guys might come to an agreement! The first group are defending a dogma, so they are defending their life. While the second group are just thinking it out. They have nothing they need to defend and they are wise enought to know it. History has said: Will Rogers, Mark Twain and Abraham Lincoln were lions!