Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (24101)	10/14/2007 7:06:13 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 218800

that version of shangri-la never existed in tibet the tibet you are trying to recover is here Message 23963966 , a fundamental theocracy that degraded its people in the majority, for the benefit of a minority, and was supported in the end by your cia, enough said for most on this thread, i trust your dalai is very funny, whitewashing the past so that it can be recovered, and the past is here Message 23963966

To: Ilaine who wrote (24101)	10/14/2007 8:29:18 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218800

am i to understand you no longer claim tibet was shangri-la in the good old days? that the theocracy's systematic destruction of its people should not be revived that its existence as a theocracy run by a framework that was designed in beijing should have been ended that the majority of the people there then and now are happy to be liberated and that you have therefore no historical basis for anything you may wish for the place now or later that, in fact, we are at a new beginning and as the current dalai lama goes the new dalai lama, chosen with aim to preserve tibetan culture will rightfully rule and that the young dalai lama is in fact chosen within framework of the very first and original dalai lama just a bunch of pointed questions, all obviously inspired from re-read Message 23963966 in effort to learn and distill the essence of IS if so, all of the above, or even any part of the above, then we can perhaps now move on to the subject you have steadfastly refused to engage on, namely your implicit support for the genocide and war crimes that is taking place in mesopotamia which is resulting in yet another secular nation being turned fundamentalist, per your preference, or not, depending on the answers btw, as to this <<He's pretty much the exact opposite of what you accuse him of being>> ... do not change the subject, I was mainly accusing you, because you are more deserving.