SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (2915)10/14/2007 8:19:03 PM
From: zeta1961  Respond to of 149317
 
As the authors of this editorial indicate, I believe he's not effectively shown that his abilities as a candidate supercede the fears folk may have about his race impacting the general election..and I do hope he can do something about this..yet I don't know how he can unless like JFK and his catholocism, brings it up directly on the stump?..

cmonitor.com

One question lurks large in Sen. Barack Obama's campaign: Can an African-American win the presidency?

Only white men have won the presidency since 1789, and no major party has ever come close to nominating an African-American. Obama is challenging that history.

We're Americans. By now, we should all be color-blind. In Martin Luther King's memorable phrase, we should all judge our fellow citizens on the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

But of course we're not color-blind. And those of us who want to be color-blind cannot resist the suspicion that a large percentage of the populace is not with us on this. Thus even people inclined to vote for Obama can easily find a reason not to. That reason would be that the country is not ready for a black president. Or, put another way, a lot of people, older people especially, those who vote in the greatest proportion, won't vote for Obama because of the color of his skin.

This means Obama must be not just a good candidate but a great one. Being smart, thoughtful, eloquent, handsome, moderate and steeped in the issues is not enough.


That Obama is all these things is the reason people have contributed millions of dollars to his campaign. It is why he has attracted so many people who say that his candidacy inspires them and gives them hope. To his supporters, to elect him would say something grand about the country.

The challenge for Obama is to grow his campaign from this base. To do that, he has to be great. He has to convince Democrats and independents that his race is an asset. He has to connect with voters in ways in which he has so far failed to do. He has to show voters that he is not only the best candidate in the field but also that his race is not a subtly - or even silently - exploitable liability in the general election.

Obama knows all this. He knows that after an initial burst of excitement, his campaign hit a plateau. He knows New Hampshire has a special affection for the Clintons. And he knows race

is an issue in 2007-08.

He told Monitor editors most of this during an editorial board interview last week.

Of all the major presidential candidates who have come to the paper over the years, Obama won the prize for candor and directness. Candidates are dodgers and shifters, expert at saying what they want to say rather than answering the questions you ask. Not Obama. Whether we asked about his energy level, his sometimes professorial demeanor or his use of cocaine as a teenager, he gave us straight answers.

Hard questions

Because race isn't something Americans are comfortable talking about, we asked about it gingerly, haltingly even. Obama was direct in his response, speaking with conviction and nuance about his desire to move the country forward.

If he were president, he said, the world would look at the United States differently. African-American children would look at themselves and their prospects differently, and white children would look at African-American children differently. [This is fine for the choir but in no way convinces those resistant to a Black POTUS]

On race, as on other matters, Obama is a realist.

When we talked about his plans for health care, he said he was certain the majority of Americans wanted change. He added that a majority also doubted change was possible.

When we talked about race, he said the majority of Americans now believed in the principle of equal treatment of all citizens. He added that most people spent little time considering the gap between this ideal and the reality in America.

The result, he said, is that our country "is not living up to who we think we are." And in the next breath: "Let's do something about it."


For New Hampshire Democrats, being realistic about race poses a dilemma. They believe they are in position to recapture the White House in 2008. An unpopular war, Republican fiscal negligence and the results of the last election have all fed this belief. So have the GOP's public soul-searching and the weakness of its presidential field.

Because of race, an Obama victory here could pose an unnecessary risk in an otherwise favorable situation for Democrats. It might be a victory for principle, for justice and progress, for diversity and open-mindedness. But because of the current of unspoken racism that even optimists suspect still runs through the electorate, an Obama victory could also play into Republican hands.

You could pose a similar argument on the basis of Hillary Clinton's gender, but the race question is more problematic. There are people who would not vote for a woman for president, but African-Americans are a minority while women constitute a majority in America.

Obama has less than three months to connect with New Hampshire voters and to expand on his promising start. He has three months to show them that his fine mind, high ideals and measured approach make him the best choice.

But he will succeed only if he is able to convince voters that his qualities as a potential president cancel their fears about where the country really stands on race. Although this is an unfair burden in an already difficult quest, it is also a real one.

We shall overcome? It would be good to think so.