Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: octavian who wrote (1625)	10/15/2007 10:53:45 PM
From: InvesTing	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2121

Octavian acting as my straight man asks: "Why don't you show us these "different stories," or at least tell us who this unnamed person is? Otherwise, most of us (or maybe even all of us) will think you are blowing smoke." I'd be happy to. Unlike shills I don't have to lie --the truth is all you need about Brinker and his alibi artists like this one! Ok Octavian I'll play. As you know Fakelimp and Taters was the same guy as Joe from spokane and I don't know how many others. He was a Brinker shill deluxe and probably is very familiar with and one of the posters here with the current alibi. Used the same ruse to claim the QQQ debacle was insignificant. unfortunately like Brinker posting as Don Lane, he wasn't as careful posting about what he did with the QQQs as he should have been. So he was exposed as a lying shill for Brinker. You can look it up on yahoo if you like. <br><br><br>Re: P.S.<br>by: faklempt012001 05/12/01 01:01 am<br>Msg: 11749 of 65167 <br><br>I would like to add a different perspective to the never ending debate here as to whether Bob is a genius or an idiot....When Bob called the market turn in Jan 2000, I again heeded his advice. However, not quite understanding why he would be 35% invested in a bear market, I TOOK EVERTHING OFF THE TABLE.<br>I DIDN'T DO EITHER QQQ TRADE BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT SOUNDED A LITTLE TOO RISKY FOR MY TASTE. Consequently, I got all the benefits of the bull market, and none of the losses during the bear. My opinion is that there are a lot of Brinker supporters out there just like me.<br><br>The link has been censored so just put the number o the post in your search box on the thread<br><br>Then the LYING SHILL said a couple months later<br><br>Re: Fakelamp..how about your QQQ's?<br>by: faklempt012001 07/28/01 02:02 am<br>Msg: 13726 of 65166 <br><br>I invested 20% of my portfolio in QQQ's at about $80 on Bob's advice. I knew it was risky (common sense?) and bailed when it hit about $60. Most of the rest of my money is in cash earning 5%-6%, waiting for moabo. I thank Bob for my having a rather uneventful two years during this ugly market<br><br>link censored so just look up the number<br>Re: From Will_L at Suite101<br>by: faklempt012001 08/16/01 04:04 am<br>Msg: 13955 of 65167 <br><br>Actually I put about 20% of my cash reserves in them Q's and so lost about 5% of my total portfolio. It hurt, but was not terminal pain. I'm over it. I still like Brinker. Let me explain why. Because of his January call, I went 70% cash. I put the 30% in a small cap fund (for defensive purposes). That fund (Berger small cap value) has done fine. I then got whacked for the 5% loss in the QQQ. No big deal. The bottom line is that before the January call I was 100% invested in a tech heavy large cap growth fund which did fine in the 90's but took a 60% haircut since march 2000. So, even with the qqq action, I am a whole lot better off for adapting a conservative portfolio based on Brinker's warning. And he was a lone voice in the wilderness at that time. So...why should I hate Brinker. <br><br>The links are censored because BRINKER doesn't want you to see the truth about his LYING SHILL joe Taters LOL Just look up the post number in the search.<br><br>Last night JOE FROM SPOKANE was lying over on Suite 101 still shilling or Brinker. <br><br>Author: JoefromSpokane <br>Date: January 21, 2004 8:22 PM <br>Subject: Re: Joe, Moonlight and Dija Could Get Rich From My Idea <br>In response to message posted by DellaO:<br>Della...I think what I said is that it was easy to see that Brinker made a bad call with the QQQ when it hit about 60. YOU know now thatit was a bad call. Is it so strange that I would recognize that fact when it was down 25% as opposed to you who I guess didn't understand that until it was down 70-80%? " So you see they make this crap up to make Brinker look better and QQQuite often they are CAUGHT as Brinker's LYING SHILLS. They can and do "MAKE THIS STUFF UP" HTH