SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (16958)10/16/2007 9:17:43 AM
From: Sam  Respond to of 36917
 
Growth is not our only goal, Hu tells Chinese
· Sustainability and cutting inequality high on agenda
· Few political reforms in speech at party congress

Jonathan Watts in Beijing
Tuesday October 16, 2007

Guardian

President Hu Jintao admitted yesterday that China's Communist party had failed to live up to the expectations of the people and promised a more sustainable and accountable policy of development.
In a speech that will set China's direction for the next five years, Mr Hu spoke of the need to address the problems of environmental degradation, political corruption and income inequality between the rich cities on the eastern seaboard and villages in the poor western interior.

Mr Hu was speaking at the opening of the 17th Communist party congress - the most important political event in China since the last congress in 2002 - at a time when the leader's words have never carried more weight in the outside world.

Boasting of an average growth rate of more than 10% a year since taking power, Mr Hu vowed to continue the reforms that had pushed China past Britain to become the fourth biggest economy. "To stop or reverse reform and opening up would only lead to a blind alley," he warned.

In the political sphere, he held out the prospect of only limited changes, none of which would challenge the one-party system. An expansion of "inner party democracy" will give 73 million party members more opportunities to vote on policy and leadership, introduce a tenure system for delegates to congress and make the decision making process more open to scrutiny. For most of the 1.3 billion population, there was no clear timetable for an expansion of accountability beyond choosing village chiefs, the lowest level of government. "Citizens' participation in political affairs will expand in an orderly way," he said. "Power must be exercised in the sunshine to ensure that it is exercised correctly."

During his time in office, Mr Hu said the number of rural poor had fallen from 250 million to 20 million, the military had been modernised and the first Chinese astronauts had ventured into space. But, after record levels of protests in the countryside, he admitted that the party had struggled to keep pace with the rapid changes in society. "While recognising our achievements, we must be well aware that they still fall short of the expectations of the people," he said. "The governance capability of the party falls somewhat short of the need to deal with the new situation and tasks."

Among the problems he identified were weak grass-roots organisations, excessive bureaucracy, and waste and corruption by a "small number of party cadres". Last year, 8,310 members were punished for accepting bribes, but that figure accounts only for those who were caught and corruption is endemic.

Mr Hu used the 135-minute speech to amplify his theory of a "scientific outlook on development", which will be written into the party charter. It represents a change of focus from quantity to quality in national governance, and from revolution to plutocracy in party ideology. Instead of merely aiming for high growth, it emphasises sustainability and social harmony. "Our economic growth is realised at an excessively high cost of resources and the environment," Mr Hu noted.

He made his speech in front of a giant hammer and sickle symbol. But decades after the semi-religious reverence of Mao Zedong, the former hydro-engineer relies less on ideology and charisma and more on asserting his qualities as a pragmatic manager. Mao's theory of class struggle, he said, was an erroneous theory.

Mr Hu held out an olive branch to Taiwan. "We would like to make a solemn appeal: On the basis of the one-China principle, let us discuss a formal end to the state of hostility between the two sides, reach a peace agreement," he said. "We are willing to make every effort with the utmost sincerity to achieve peaceful reunification of the two sides and will never allow anyone to separate Taiwan from the motherland in any name or by any means." Taiwan's government rejected the overture as "devoid of significance".

At the end of the congress, the party will unveil a new line-up of the standing committee of the politburo, China's most powerful political body. Mr Hu will promote several supporters, but given the influence of his predecessor Jiang Zemin and the need to balance factional interests, he is also expected to make compromises that would have been undreamed of by past leaders.

guardian.co.uk



To: neolib who wrote (16958)10/16/2007 9:18:24 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 36917
 
No that would be Al Gore's father



To: neolib who wrote (16958)10/16/2007 11:34:05 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 36917
 
Respect
Al Gore's commitment to public service in the face of cynicism
Posted by David Roberts at 12:16 AM on 16 Oct 2007

"Hey Crichton, won the Pulitzer yet?"
Photo: Eric Neitzel/WireImage.

I get accused of "hero worshiping" Gore, which I don't think is right, but I do have immense respect for the guy, so I thought I'd say why.

Even now, I don't think people appreciate what a punch in the gut the 2000 election was for Gore. The previous eight years had been spent in the shadow of a pol who had the charm and magnetism Gore lacked, but Clinton did not share Gore's passion for the environment, wasn't willing to put his ass on the line for it, and his poor discipline and unforced errors left much of the rest of their shared agenda unfulfilled. 2000 was Gore's chance to finally control his own fate, to rise to the test for which he had been preparing almost his entire life.

Then he walked into a slow motion disaster: got terrible advice, had to fend off a third-party run from the left, endured a hail of antagonism, caricature, and mockery from the press (right-wing and mainstream), got very little support from the Democratic establishment, and ran a hesitant, confused campaign. He still managed to get more votes, yet defeat came nonetheless, in the most arbitrary, unjust way possible.

He had to step aside and watch the presidency go to a callow, incurious silver spoon who'd been a shiftless drunk 'til the age of 40. With some justification, he saw himself as a victim, but he got no support from his party -- most Democrats abandoned or disdained him. On top of it all, he was more or less broke. Who knows what stew of shame, anger, and regret he must have faced afterward.

He could have withdrawn completely. He could have taken a cushy job in a think tank or university somewhere, or stayed at home writing books. Who among us wouldn't have?

It says something about his character that Gore went through the ringer, got up, dusted himself off, and tried to figure how best he could be of use. The solid ground that led him out of the fog was the one constant in his professional life: public service. He'd always tried to make the world a better place. In doing so, he has struggled against his own limitations, his inwardness and introversion, his prosaic style of speaking, his inability to appear comfortable in his own skin in public, his uncanny ability to inspire mockery even among those he is trying to serve. In spite of all of it, he has never retreated into the shell of cynicism that protects so many of us. He has always continued to care and to try, as best he could, to serve.

So it was to service he turned after his bitter loss. He fired up his little slideshow and trudged out in the world to try to get people concerned about a danger he believes could end civilization. In those early years there was no glamour. He was playing to rooms of dozens, or hundreds, not thousands. He wasn't being feted, he was flying coach. Global warming wasn't on the agenda. He never could have anticipated awards or acclaim.

I don't mean to paint Gore as a saint, or say there's no ego or calculation behind his actions. Human beings are complicated. But the explanation of his life that makes the most sense, that requires the fewest pop-psychological speculations and conspiracy theories, is that he's a decent, committed human being. He kept plodding on, kept trying, until he got it right. What finally worked for him was artless, unapologetic sincerity. This irony-armored reality TV world goes piss poorly on sincerity. I won't apologize for being inspired by its improbable success.
gristmill.grist.org