SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (355005)10/16/2007 12:38:38 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578302
 
how many times have "they" claimed something to be true medically only to be proven wrong further down the road?

Every week - no one said they're 100% harmless - the point is they are the least harmful compared to guns, sprays and night sticks - as data has shown. So given the alternatives, as long as they're not abused, it gets rather tiring to hear the false complaints. Seriously, what is the point of a sensational fairly rare taser death - to try and stop there usage and go back to unreported deaths - like the one you claim can occur when cops sit on your tiny frame.



To: tejek who wrote (355005)10/16/2007 10:56:28 PM
From: SirVinny  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578302
 
Are you proposing that cops shoot?

Pick your choice, taser vs gunshot, which would you suggest?