To: longnshort who wrote (85875 ) 10/16/2007 7:44:12 PM From: sea_biscuit Respond to of 93284 providence.edu The Surgical Precision Myth: After the Bomb Explodes -- (CCDP) Cumulative Collateral Damage Probability by Peter Spang Goodrich Version 11 June 2003 "Our military capabilities are so devastating and precise that we can destroy an Iraqi tank under a bridge without damaging the bridge."1 Donald Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense The U. S. military often describes modern aerial bombardment as surgical using smart Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs). The media unquestioningly accepts these dubious metaphors. Too often, the press pack repeats these misleading and inaccurate descriptions of modern bombing. Thus, civilian deaths and injuries, euphemistically referred to as "collateral damage," are trivialized. Military apologists try to explain any rarely admitted civilian deaths as mistakes. At other times, dumb bombs are blamed for the inaccuracy. This paper is not concerned with mistakes or errors, nor with "dumb" unguided bombs, only with perfectly delivered precision guided munitions (PGMs). Even in this no mistakes case, PGMs cut a wide swath of blast, heat, and fragmentation, gouge huge craters, and wreak widespread havoc and destruction. The surgical precision myth claimed by the Department of Defense implodes after the bomb explodes. As one hears numbers suggesting that new smart bombs cause less collateral damage than old dumb ones, remember that all bombs explode hurling shrapnel, heat, and blast well beyond the small circle in which they are intended to land. The only difference is that the intended target circle is smaller for guided ordnance. The military prefers guided bombs because fewer bombs and sorties are required to hit the target. Guided bombs are only conventional bombs with guidance systems attached. Both smart and dumb bombs explode precisely the same way.