Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (16929)	10/17/2007 6:40:17 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

LIAR. Carter had nothing to do with the Shah's fall because the US has no military options in Iran and never has, except surgical strike type stuff. We also cannot prop up elitist dictators when 90% of their people want them gone. Besides there were an option to remove Khomani why did Reagan arm him instead of attacking himself? Reagan was a major hawk. But he did absolutely nothing but arm the SOB's. The country is three times as big as Iraq and we can't even control Baghdad. Wake up and get real.