Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (1651)	10/17/2007 7:14:28 PM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2121

Ms. Honey, InvesTing is assuming many things erroneously and then presenting his erroneous assumption as fact, and it's not the first time my truthfulness about my personal own personal life has been challenged and questioned from Stockie's direction, now is it? Remember the "farm" brouhaha? So it really doesn't pay for anyone else to repeat his erroneous assumptions as if they were accepted fact, now does it? I've answered Joe, I've answered Kirk, I've answered InvesTing (the poster formerly known as stockalot and several other names). Now is it Honey's turn? Is it Keep Queenie Busy Day ALREADY? :) Regarding the erroneous assumptions presented as fact, repeated in your post: [queen] claims to have been "out of state" at the time and couldn't "sell a thing." No, I didn't "claim" that at all. I said I was out of state at the time of the January call. That last part in quotation marks is not something I've said. Therefore, it's a misquote presented as fact. Ms. Queen quite candidly admitted that even though she is a long-time, loyal Marketimer subscriber... No, I didn't say that. As a matter of fact, I don't believe I was a subscriber in January of 2000. I heard about the January call later, and subscribed later. We had been listening to Bob Brinker's Moneytalk as regularly as we could UNTIL we left for a while, so that's why I was surprised when I heard about the January call. It seems odd to me that some posters can't or won't or don't wish to believe that I accept responsibility for my own actions and failure to act when I should have. I wonder why it's so hard to believe that someone could take personal responsibility rather than blaming someone else? (I must say Ms.queen, you were "out of state" for a very long time, weren't you?) 8^) No, I didn't say or imply that I was out of state or out of touch all that time. I explained that "I heard about it later". But somehow that's seeming not to compute with some posters here--or else it's being overlooked, for whatever reasons. Then to follow up, InvesTing pointed out that Ms Queen DID get home in time to take advantage of Brinker's big "countertrend rally--buy QQQ immediately" hocus-pocus, which she jumped right on--paying almost top-dollar for them. I was home long before that, mizhon (we have to be here most of the time in the spring, summer and fall), and I did get the October bulletin, and I did buy some QQQ at $78.10 but not a lot, and it was certainly not "disastrous" in any way. Somehow, some posters who have never met me and know nothing about me other than what I post, have assumed (and have erroneously assumed for some time) that they know a great deal about me. But no matter how many time these erroneous and false assumptions and speculation and challenges to my truthfulness are posted (and reposted) as fact and "agreed" with, they are still erroneous. * I lost FAR more by NOT following Brinker's January advice than I ever did on the QQQ advice. *