Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (2232)	10/18/2007 10:05:37 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Respond to of 42652

<<<I assume you mean rationing medical care. Thanks, I would prefer to pass on rationed care. The idea of having to suck up to a government bureaucrat to ensure that I can have life saving medical care is not one that appeals to me. >>> You are making a lot of assumptions. With a good healthcare policy and competency in the Whitehouse, providing health care for the poor does not take away anything from anyone else. In fact that is what Hillary has proposed. Sure, if you continue electing current WH types, you can very succesfully make all these nasty self fulfilling prophecies.