Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (355431)	10/19/2007 8:19:15 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1573150

"There is no question that Hillary would be an improvement over Bush.....no question at all." Chris hit the nail on the head. What is the biggest difference between the Clinton administration and Smirk's? Or, for that matter, Smirk's and any other administration? Dubya appointed hanger ons and camp followers. It didn't matter if they had any experience or even knowledge of the areas they were supposed to manage. While there is always a certain amount of that, Pet Goat Boy explored whole new continents of nepotism and incompetence. Whatever else you can say about Hillary, she is smart. She isn't going to make the same mistakes. In fact, I strongly suspect that she won't be ideological at all. There won't be pet projects. There won't be a grand vision. Just competent management by the best and the brightest. The contrast would be so strong that she would go down in history. Which is probably what she wants more than anything. Of course, I am not convinced she can get elected. And quite frankly, it is a job that I think any of the Democrats could pull off. Not so sure about the Republicans. Guiliana is running as velociraptor in chief. Other of the Republicans talk a similar game.