SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (87832)10/21/2007 11:32:41 AM
From: jmparret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
As usual these things are written by lawyers and are quite confusing. My read is you can withdraw $100,000 but have to pay it back within 3 years. My calculations show that paying back $100,000 in three years at 7% interest is about $3100 per month. If you cannot pay your mortgage how would you pay that??? Oh you don't, after 3 years you are charged the 10% penalty and dont have to pay the 100Gs.

Here is the sentence that caused me to think this.

"The HOME Act would make withdrawals for the purpose of refinancing or avoiding foreclosure penalty-free as well, as long as they are paid back within three years."

Of course this was taken out of context and the first sentence does not state a repayment requirement for anyone 60 days past due.

Joe



To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (87832)10/21/2007 11:59:08 AM
From: GST  Respond to of 110194
 
Ya -- empty you 401k and pour it into your moneypit of a house -- now there is a move that makes great financial sense for the "homeowner" -- how about allowing a gigantic cash advance on your credit card -- that would work just as well. The real solutions are as obvious as they are painful -- and I don't say that with any joy in my heart.