Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (246560)	10/25/2007 7:38:57 AM
From: c.hinton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine....you have posted a very onesided opinion. Palastinians were displaced....they were also a risk to the internal security of an infant israeli state. Other arab states had no incentive to accept refugees... Jews, of all people, should realize this... having been turned away by many countries even during the Nazi era. Israel has the most to win in finding a solution....... Israel has the most to loose in not finding a solution.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (246560)	10/25/2007 8:33:15 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

But the entire point of the exercise is that no solution is possible unless Israel gets destroyed or the Arabs help find a solution. Isreal doesn't need to "get destroyed". Let them all live together in a secular Pasreal, no destruction, no refugees, no land dispute. The problems might shift to something else - in your mind to how to get Muslims to accept life in a secular Pasreal - but theoretically it is solvable without the destruction of anything. Palestinian refugees want the right to live as equals inside Israel, the West Bank and/or Palestine - OK, give it to them, over the course of the next 20 years. Problem solved.